No Parking. Tackling one of payment by results biggest challenges

Like a wolf on the fold

Justice Secretary Chris Grayling has made it very clear that payment by results is going to come down on the criminal justice system like Lord Byron’s Assyrian wolf on the fold.

 

http://article.wn.com/view/2010/01/24/The_Destruction_of_Sennacherib/

 

He has suspended the PbR pilots and all the signs are that he intends to go straight to full roll out.

Mr Grayling has come from the Department of Work and Pensions whose Work Programme is the largest PbR scheme in the world.

So, like many other people in the criminal justice world, I’ve been reading up on studies on the different welfare to work initiatives to get a sense of which elements of the payment by results approach are most effective.

The Work Programme

Of course the DWP finally published the first outcomes of the Work Programme last Tuesday 27 November, revealing that only about 3.5% unemployed people were helped into “sustainable jobs”. Since most experts reckon that 5% long term unemployed find their own jobs without any help within a year, this is not a great outcome for a programme expected to cost £5.6 billion over five years.

One of the main criticisms of PbR schemes is that if the outcome metrics aren’t set carefully, providers will exploit the system by:

Cherry-picking – working with the individuals who are the easiest to find jobs for or stop re-offending and/or

Parking – not working with those who will find it hardest to achieve these goals, effectively depriving them of a service because they are unlikely to generate income.

 

 

Jane Mansour, an international work programme expert who did a great video interview on the lessons of welfare to work payment by results schemes, sent me the Social Market Foundation evaluation of the Flexible New Deal undertaken by Ian Mulheirn (@ianmulheirn) & Verena Menne.

It’s an intelligent read with a great series of recommendations including:

“The Flexible New Deal should offer prime contractors outcome payments that increase for each additional client they place in employment. This would provide the resources needed to develop the capacity to help all jobseekers, rather than just those closest to the labour market.”

I think this is a great idea which could just as easily be applied to re-offending.

Let’s imagine a PbR scheme is working with 1,000 offenders with a likely re-offending rate of 50%.

It would be straightforward to set an agreed outcome incentive for each of the first 50 offenders (after the initial expected 500) who did not re-offend, the increase that incentive by 5% for the next 50, 10% for the 50 after that and so on.

The attraction of this concept to me is that it is a very simple means of getting back to two of PbR’s central tenets:

  1. Driving up outcomes and
  2. Stimulating innovation

If providers are incentivised to get the most prolific and persistent offenders to stop committing crime, then PbR re-offending schemes will meet the needs of everybody: the exchequer, local communities and offenders themselves.

As always, let me know what you think in the comments section below:

 

 

2 Comments

  1. steve freer 5th December 2012
  2. Russell Webster 5th December 2012

Leave a Reply

Select Language
Andrew Brown July 16
Interesting drug and alcohol facts July 2016
The extra mile road sign
The practicalities of desistance and recovery
two-wine-celebration-glasse
Drinking patterns in 2016
facebook cannabis
Do digital interventions for cannabis problems work?
EM FI
Latest research on electronic monitoring
gavel court room
Early guilty pleas may force up prison population
reflections
Refreshing your perspective with peer research
women who kill dv
What happens to women who kill their abusers?
RW MoJ
Who are the new team at the Moj?
Liz Truss
Introducing new Justice Secretary Liz Truss
SUI RDA FI
Service user involvement with offenders
panel
Referral orders not achieving their potential
cybercrime mouse trap
Five key things about new crime stats
HOme Affairs prostitution
Should we decriminalise sex work?
paper clips
Myth: Only radical reforms can reduce crime
crime headlines
Why do we always think crime is rising?
RW MoJ
Who are the new team at the Moj?
RDA prisoner involvement FI
How to do prisoner involvement properly
prison hospital
Health and well-being in future prisons
Liz Truss
Introducing new Justice Secretary Liz Truss
Payment by Results
sumo
Can the new Work Programme succeed?
SIBS SF FI
Social Impact Bonds: The early years
2
Making sense of payment by results
Finally Friday Social Media Innovation Why I Tweet
facebook cannabis
Do digital interventions for cannabis problems work?
AG FI
The law and social media
Unlock Youtube
Unlocking offenders’ doors to employment
MoJ women in cj stats FI
Women and the Criminal Justice System
AG FI
The law and social media
Wooden gallows rope and noose in St Augustine Florida
Global executions at a 25 year high
Balaclava girl
Crime accounts for 1.5% of world GDP

Keep up to date on drugs, crime & PbR

Every new post straight to your inbox