Keep up-to-date with drugs and crime

The latest research, policy, practice and opinion on our criminal justice and drug & alcohol treatment systems
Search
What’s in the new probation contracts?
The MoJ has decided to stick to its decision to make PbR payments on both binary (reducing the proportion of people who commit further offences) and frequency (reducing the total number of offences) measures. However, providers can only receive the frequency payment if they meet the binary target – the so called binary hurdle remains in place.

Payment mechanism design overview

Last week (10 February 2014) the MoJ published another batch of 29 documents relating to the new probation contracts. Amongst these was the latest information about the payment mechanism. This is not the final version – the document is called the “Payment Mechanism Design Overview” but does provide more information than we had before.

[divider]

Maximum Annual Payment

We already knew that there were two elements to the payment mechanism: Fee for Service (FFS) and Payment by Results (PbR):

  • The FFS is primarily paid for mandated activities that deliver the sentence of the court and licence conditions and includes Through the Gate services and Rehabilitation Activity Requirements.
  •  PbR is paid for “statistically significant reductions in reoffending against the historical baseline”.

 We now know that these two elements are related via the Maximum Annual Payment (MAP). The MAP is the total available funding in any year for a Contract Package Area. Providers will be required to bid a FFS for each year of the contract. The difference between the FFS bid and the MAP will form the basis of the amount available for PbR.

 It seems clear that those providers who bid a lower price for the FFS will have a better chance of winning the contracts. This seems sensible to me since they will have to deliver an effective service and reduce reoffending in order to make up the full value of the contract via PbR.

 The MoJ is requiring new providers to include a “learning curve discount” – effectively reducing the price every year, this has the effect of increasing the PbR proportion of the contract every year. The graphic below from the document is based on a MAP of £11m and a Maximum Biddable FFS of £10m:

MAP FFS

 Binary vs Frequency

The MoJ has decided to stick to its decision to make PbR payments on both binary (reducing the proportion of people who commit further offences) and frequency (reducing the total number of offences) measures. However, providers can only receive the frequency payment if they meet the binary target – the so called binary hurdle remains in place.

The new document gives the first indication of pricing for successfully reducing reoffending:

  •  The unit payment for achievement on the binary metric is £4,000 per offender who desists from reoffending.
  •  The unit payment for achievement on the frequency metric is £1,000 per reoffence avoided.

[Of course, these payments are only received if providers succeed in reducing reoffending past historical levels.]

[divider]

What else do we know?

The payment mechanism design overview does address a number of other key issues which all providers have been waiting to hear about and which are critical for the pricing of bids:

  • There will be a PbR bedding in period of between 6-9 months depending on when exactly the contracts start – the MoJ document envisages the start dates as being some time between October 2014 and July 2015.
  • The first year MAP will include funding from the MoJ for the “Voluntary Early Departure Scheme” – redundancies.
  • The baseline for reoffending rates will be for offenders starting community sentences or who were released from prison in 2011.
  • If providers fail to match existing reoffending rates, deductions will be made to the FFS they receive and they may have their contract terminated.

For those of you interested in the detail of the new payment mechanism, there is a further document (number 11) within the same batch of 29 documents which provides a full schedule and all the technical detail of the proposed new contracts.

 

Share This Post

Related posts

On Probation
Did Peterborough and Doncaster reoffending pilots succeed?

So what do we make of these results? To me they represent a mixed picture, there’s no denying that reoffending has been reduced. However, we would normally expect a high level of performance from such a high profile pilot where the partners had chosen to participate and indeed championed and driven the initiative from the outset. On the other hand, there has been significant learning about how best to co-ordinate pre-and post-release activity, use mentors effectively and co-ordinate a multi-agency approach to preventing reoffending.

On Probation
Justice Committee on payment by results

There was also concern that there would be insufficient investment in TR to enable providers to reduce reoffending – particularly with the extension of probation to short term prisoners. Ideally, the payment mechanism should incentivise providers to take risks and develop new approaches to reducing reoffending. If these approaches are successful, society (through less crime), the taxpayer (less demand on services) and the new providers (PbR bonus payments) all benefit.

On Probation
Latest probation reoffending rates – November 2013

Last week the MoJ published the latest local adult re-offending rates for the year ending on 30 June 2013. These figures will be scrutinised more closely than ever given the upcoming privatisation of the probation service via the government’s Transforming Rehabilitation project.

On Probation
Latest on Transforming Rehabilitation Payment Mechanism

The Ministry of Justice responds to criticisms of its proposed payment mechanism for the new Transforming rehabilitation contracts and appears to be willing to make substantial changes. However, there will be no details until the “Invitation to Negotiate” stage of the procurement process…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Probation posts sponsored by Unilink

 

Excellence through innovation

Unilink, Europe’s provider of Offender/Probation Management Software

Subscribe

Get every blog post by email for free