If Ellie Cumbo were justice secretary

There are a hundred things I’d like to do as my third priority, like reverse the cuts to prison budgets or fully implement the Corston review. But unless I also happened to have time-shifting superpowers, the likelihood is that I couldn’t afford any of them. But there is one more thing that’s fairly inexpensive, cannot be cast as either soft or illiberal and would finally bring a much-n

Share This Post

Share on twitter
Share on facebook
Share on linkedin
Share on email

Ellie Cumbo is a justice policy researcher and writer with experience of working in both victim and offender charities. She is also a not-uncritical Labour party member, is elected to the Fabian Women’s Network Executive, coordinates the non-partisan policy evidence website www.shouldwe.org, and tweets from @EllieCumbo. She is the latest contributor to a guest blog series setting out priorities for the new justice secretary.

Three Priorities

The previous New Labour government relied a little too much on authoritarianism to resolve problems that required subtler solutions, and criminal justice was perhaps the clearest example. But there is nothing illiberal about the commitment they have set out in opposition to improve the way the system treats victims. Too often, the relative powerlessness of victims in criminal cases is forgotten, or assumed to be the inevitable consequence of the need to safeguard defendants’ rights. This is framing justice as a zero-sum game, which I don’t think we should accept.

[divider]

1. No more prosecuting victims who deny their abuse

So my first priority as Justice Secretary would be to implement the 14 Labour Victims’ Taskforce recommendations for a new Victims’ Law. And I would add a 15th, following the infamous 2012 case of ‘Sarah’, imprisoned for retracting what had in fact been a true allegation of rape. Despite CPS guidelines making this rarer, it still remains possible in our law to prosecute a victim for denying their abuse. This creates a wholly perverse incentive for the police, who should be working to make victims feel able to report crime; not arresting them when they do not. It would be a small tweak, but a symbolic one.

[divider]

2. Treat children as children

My second priority would involve finding a level of confidence I won’t pretend it’s easy for a new minister to muster. In politics, the imperative is always to be doing something new; instead, I propose at least one act of undoing. In 1998, legislation was passed to end the presumption known as doli incapax, by which the state had to show a child aged 10-14 had enough understanding of right and wrong before they could be prosecuted. In 2015, or not long after, the next government should put it straight back again, in line with virtually every other county in the civilised world.

This would reflect our increased understanding of how maturity develops over time, as per the paradigm-shifting work of the Transitions 2 Adulthood Alliance. What’s more, in the long and still rippling wake of Operation Yewtree, we have at last begun to see real popular conviction behind the idea that children in their early teens do not have the same capacity to consent to sex as adults. The time is right to accept that this must have consequences for their criminal responsibility also, and to restore a social instead of criminal approach to such troubled young people.

[divider]

3. Rights for offenders’ families

There are a hundred things I’d like to do as my third priority, like reverse the cuts to prison budgets or fully implement the Corston review. But unless I also happened to have time-shifting superpowers, the likelihood is that I couldn’t afford any of them. But there is one more thing that’s fairly inexpensive, cannot be cast as either soft or illiberal and would finally bring a much-neglected group of justice “users” into the light. Based on the Victims’ Code model, I would create a charter of rights for offenders’ families.

This should gather together and secure all those obligations the state owes this group of citizens, both legal and moral, in terms of information, visit facilitation, and support with the emotional and practical consequences of having their family suddenly and shockingly reshaped despite having committed no crime themselves.

In short, my three priorities would be what I personally look for in any politician: compassion, a clear-eyed view of injustice, and the courage to act upon it.

 

The purpose of this blog series is to stimulate a debate about where our criminal justice system should be heading. I’d love to hear your thoughts on what the justice priorities should be.

Please use the comments section below or follow the conversation on Twitter, using the hashtag #nextGrayling

Share This Post

Share on twitter
Share on facebook
Share on linkedin
Share on email

Related posts

On Probation
The Probation Institute’s Justice priorities

Splitting up responsibility for offender management has created a divide between a small national probation service and the 21 CRCs leading a huge increase in bureaucracy and growing professional tensions. The probation profession is potentially being undermined as there is no longer a requirement for CRCs to use staff with recognised probation qualifications. They no longer have to employ qualified probation officers to manage complex cases.

Featured
The Prison Governors’ Association justice priorities

We cannot go on thinking we can imprison our way to a safer society, not only is it poor value for money for the taxpayer, it also fails to recognise the evidence already available that there are better and more cost effective ways to protect the public and reduce reoffending.

On Probation
Justice should embrace the treasury

It is this relentless focus on ensuring that everything we do actually achieves our aims that is desperately needed in crime and justice policy. To do something radical such as cutting prison numbers, a new Justice Secretary will need allies and I think the best bet is the Treasury.

On Probation
If NoOffence! were Justice Secretary

The design of the CJS is not evidence-led, despite some attempts to reference evidence when it fits the prevailing ‘politics’. The prevailing ‘politics’ and public attitude is one of punishment first and foremost . Any discussion is predominantly an emotional response to the harm done by those who commit crimes, bounded by vested interests and political dogma.

On Probation
If Mike Maiden was Justice Secretary…

I want a public sector provider that sits at the heart of the process. I can’t turn the clock back but I can make sure that one part of the system takes overall responsibility. It’s got to be the public sector because I can’t see that justice and transparency are served by any other sector playing the role.

Alcohol & Drugs
RAPt 3 priorities for the new Justice Secretary

How does the new Justice Secretary direct extra resources at interventions that achieve the departmental objective of reducing reoffending, while managing what is likely to be a further 20-30% cut to the departmental budget? A brave leader would use this opportunity to end the madness of the highest prison population in Europe – costing taxpayers over £3 billion per year, a high proportion of which is

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

All Probation Posts are sponsored by Unilink

With over 20 years’ experience in the criminal justice sector, Unilink is a world leader in probation and community corrections software applications, as well as prisoner self-service, prisoner/case management and prisoner communications. Unilink’s integrated suite of products provide a complete digital solution enabling efficient running of prisons and probation. Underpinned by biometrics it integrates seamlessly to deliver security, efficiency and value – while being proven to help rehabilitate prisoners.

keep informed

One email every day at noon