Keep up-to-date with drugs and crime

The latest research, policy, practice and opinion on our criminal justice and drug & alcohol treatment systems
Justice should embrace the treasury
It is this relentless focus on ensuring that everything we do actually achieves our aims that is desperately needed in crime and justice policy. To do something radical such as cutting prison numbers, a new Justice Secretary will need allies and I think the best bet is the Treasury.

Share This Post

Vicki Helyar-Cardwell, (@vickihcardwell) Director of Research and Development at Revolving Doors Agency is the latest contributor to the current guest blog series setting out the top three priorities for the new Justice Secretary.

Embrace, don’t hate the Treasury

I realise this contradicts what many of my colleagues blogging for this series have outlined, but if I were Justice Secretary I would – perhaps controversially – embrace rather than tolerate the Treasury.

What do I mean by that?  Firstly I don’t mean cutting ever more from prisons and probation budgets and asking these important public services just to do more with less. We have seen from recent inspection reports that cuts to prisons are seriously damaging rehabilitation, while the cross-party Justice Select Committee partly attributed the terrible rise in suicides and violence to staff reductions.

No, we need something much more meaningful and radical than just cutting siloed budgets. By embracing the Treasury, I mean in its function of ensuring value for money in achieving the government’s goals. I am happy to take the Justice Secretary’s own stated goals as the starting point:

“We work to protect the public and reduce reoffending, and to provide a more effective, transparent and responsive criminal justice system for victims and the public”

Although I might reshape these aims to include reducing harm and helping people to be and feel safe, this is not a bad start. The next logical step then is to decide which policies are most effective in achieving these aims, given that every pound spent must count.


Tackling complex problems

As Revolving Doors manifesto for the next government makes clear, this means tackling some of the complex problems that drive demand on the criminal justice system in the first place. People facing multiple and complex needs are over-represented on short prison sentences, often repeatedly arrested, using emergency services and experiencing entrenched poverty and deprivation. As I’ve written previously, when people are failed by social policy, it is the justice system that pick up the responsibility.

Which department recently grasped the nettle and outlined a commitment to integrate services for people with complex needs? Not the thinkers at number 10, but the number crunchers at number 11.

It was also the Treasury that put in ink to paper outlining an approach that diverts women convicted of petty non-violent crimes into community based support such as mental health treatment, drug and alcohol services and women’s centres that can reduce reoffending, and could reduce an over-reliance on costly and ineffective short prison sentences. There is, in fact, cross-party recognition that this group needs better preventative and co-ordinated support before problems escalate. However, this needs proper investment, and to date the case for diversion is being made by those holding the purse strings.

It is this relentless focus on ensuring that everything we do actually achieves our aims that is desperately needed in crime and justice policy. To do something radical such as cutting prison numbers, a new Justice Secretary will need allies and I think the best bet is the Treasury.


The purpose of this blog series is to stimulate a debate about where our criminal justice system should be heading.

I’d love to hear your thoughts on what the justice priorities should be.

Please use the comments section below or follow the conversation on Twitter, using the hashtag #nextGrayling

Share This Post

Related posts

On Probation
The Probation Institute’s Justice priorities

Splitting up responsibility for offender management has created a divide between a small national probation service and the 21 CRCs leading a huge increase in bureaucracy and growing professional tensions. The probation profession is potentially being undermined as there is no longer a requirement for CRCs to use staff with recognised probation qualifications. They no longer have to employ qualified probation officers to manage complex cases.

The Prison Governors’ Association justice priorities

We cannot go on thinking we can imprison our way to a safer society, not only is it poor value for money for the taxpayer, it also fails to recognise the evidence already available that there are better and more cost effective ways to protect the public and reduce reoffending.

On Probation
If NoOffence! were Justice Secretary

The design of the CJS is not evidence-led, despite some attempts to reference evidence when it fits the prevailing ‘politics’. The prevailing ‘politics’ and public attitude is one of punishment first and foremost . Any discussion is predominantly an emotional response to the harm done by those who commit crimes, bounded by vested interests and political dogma.

On Probation
If Mike Maiden was Justice Secretary…

I want a public sector provider that sits at the heart of the process. I can’t turn the clock back but I can make sure that one part of the system takes overall responsibility. It’s got to be the public sector because I can’t see that justice and transparency are served by any other sector playing the role.

On Probation
If Ellie Cumbo were justice secretary

There are a hundred things I’d like to do as my third priority, like reverse the cuts to prison budgets or fully implement the Corston review. But unless I also happened to have time-shifting superpowers, the likelihood is that I couldn’t afford any of them. But there is one more thing that’s fairly inexpensive, cannot be cast as either soft or illiberal and would finally bring a much-n

RAPt 3 priorities for the new Justice Secretary

How does the new Justice Secretary direct extra resources at interventions that achieve the departmental objective of reducing reoffending, while managing what is likely to be a further 20-30% cut to the departmental budget? A brave leader would use this opportunity to end the madness of the highest prison population in Europe – costing taxpayers over £3 billion per year, a high proportion of which is

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Probation posts sponsored by Unilink


Excellence through innovation

Unilink, Europe’s provider of Offender/Probation Management Software


Get every blog post by email for free