Are Police and Crime Commissioners a good idea?

Until a month or so ago, not many people had a view on whether the new Police and Crime Commissioners will be a success – for the simple reason that most people didn’t know anything about them.

Now, with just over three weeks to go to the election on 15 November, there has been a surge in publicity.

The Home Office has launched its controversial TV advert:

The Prime Minister mentioned them at length in his speech about crime yesterday.

The BBC has a dedicated website updated several times a day.

And I have to be much more selective about which coverage I update to the PCC Scoopit site that I curate:

As the debate has intensified, it has, inevitably, polarised.


Those in favour of Police and Crime Commissioners argue that the police should be locally accountable to a democratically elected figure.

They see considerable potential for co-ordinating local criminal justice systems, streamlining legal processes and improving overall impact which they say is particularly critical in the current financial climate with cuts in overall expenditure and the number of police (and probation) officers.

Some think that public services, particularly the police, have been over-funded and it will take an outsider to impose radical change.

They also say that the work of PCCs will be much more transparent and open to public debate than the current system of police authorities.


Those against the idea are most concerned about the politicisation of the process, with many seeing the motivation of introducing PCCs as a way of leading the privatisation or “outsourcing” of many police roles and duties.

The original idea – that PCCs should be independent local people of high calibre with great personal authority – has been much diluted with all the main parties fielding candidates and only a couple of independents expected to get in.

There has been increasing criticism of the calibre of candidates, including  the case of independent Lincolnshire candidate Mervyn Barrett which is getting plenty of national media attention.

Most commentators are prepared to acknowledge that there is a varied field ranging from natural leaders with a clear grasp of the key issues to some distinctly underwhelming candidates who seem to lack any policies apart from the fact that they don’t like criminals.

Some have been much less charitable:

For full story:

Others agree with PCCs in principle, but think that in practice many Chief Constables will out-manoeuvre PCCs who will have little or no impact.

Middle ground

There has generally been consensus amongst those for and against the idea of PCCs that holding a stand-alone election in the middle of November is a very risky strategy.

This decision (purportedly as a result of a compromise reached between the two coalition parties) has resulted in even the most optimistic predicting turn-out rates of 20%.

It will be interesting to see if turnout is higher in Northamptonshire, where it is likely that the Corby by-election following Louise Mensch’s retirement will be held on the same day.

I am also hoping that Lancashire will have a higher turnout rate since it has been running a full on campaign for months including even a specially commissioned song performed by the Lancashire Hotpots. (Follow @LancsPCC to see the whole range of promotional materials).

The other area where there is general agreement between both camps is a genuine curiosity over how one elected individual will fare in trying to lead the work of a number of different agencies who are all run by non-elected Chief Executives.

The proposed English and Welsh system is very different from the US one where the DA, sheriff and judges are all elected.

In London (and New York) the elected Mayor appoints his own Police Commissioner and  is, consequently, confident that they will be able to work together.

Wait and see

In less oppositional moments, many are prepared to admit to a more honest assessment that they just don’t know how PCCs will work in practice.

Starting from 19th November, we will all get a better idea.


The only organisation I know that is absolutely convinced that PCCs are going to be the best thing since sliced bread is the Reform think tank which has just published a policy document advocating that PCCs should be in control not just of police and criminal justice agencies, but emergency services such as fire and ambulance too.

This is such a unique standpoint that I have saved discussion of it to a separate blog post.



One Response

  1. Colin Skelton 12th November 2012

Leave a Reply

Select Language
Andrew Brown July 16
Interesting drug and alcohol facts July 2016
The extra mile road sign
The practicalities of desistance and recovery
Drinking patterns in 2016
facebook cannabis
Do digital interventions for cannabis problems work?
Latest research on electronic monitoring
gavel court room
Early guilty pleas may force up prison population
Refreshing your perspective with peer research
women who kill dv
What happens to women who kill their abusers?
Who are the new team at the Moj?
Liz Truss
Introducing new Justice Secretary Liz Truss
Service user involvement with offenders
Referral orders not achieving their potential
cybercrime mouse trap
Five key things about new crime stats
HOme Affairs prostitution
Should we decriminalise sex work?
paper clips
Myth: Only radical reforms can reduce crime
crime headlines
Why do we always think crime is rising?
Prison Officer recruitment
The rehabilitative workforce in future prisons
Who are the new team at the Moj?
RDA prisoner involvement FI
How to do prisoner involvement properly
prison hospital
Health and well-being in future prisons
Payment by Results
Can the new Work Programme succeed?
Social Impact Bonds: The early years
Making sense of payment by results
Finally Friday Social Media Innovation Why I Tweet
facebook cannabis
Do digital interventions for cannabis problems work?
The law and social media
Unlock Youtube
Unlocking offenders’ doors to employment

Keep up to date on drugs, crime & PbR

Every new post straight to your inbox