
The state of the criminal justice voluntary sector in 2019
Clinks State of the Sector report finds charities are still subsidising government contracts because they cannot achieve full cost recovery.
Tags are keywords. I put tags on every post to help you find the content you want. Tags may be people (Dominic Raab, say), organisations (The Howard League, PRT), themes (women offenders, homelessness) or specific items (heroin, racial disparity, ROTL). If you’re looking to research a particular issue, they can be invaluable.
Clinks State of the Sector report finds charities are still subsidising government contracts because they cannot achieve full cost recovery.
Clinks’ State of the Sector reports provide a valuable barometer of the latest trends in voluntary sector work with offenders.
Clinks report sets out key principles towards developing a whole prison approach to good mental health.
Clinks report says flexibility is vital in supporting older people in the criminal justice system.
Clinks finds charities trying to plug gaps in offender services caused by austerity.
Clinks report: There are persistent structural problems with the design of Transforming Rehabilitation that mean the very organisations the probation system relies on are shut out and left in economically unsustainable positions.
Clinks report: voluntary sector co-ordination is key to safer and more rehabilitative prisons.
Clinks, the national infrastructure organisation for the criminal justice voluntary sector, has revised its list of key principles and goals.
Briefing calls for better data to build more culturally effective services for BAME people with mental health problems in contact with the justice system.
The Farmer Review is a rigorous examination of the importance of prisoners’ relationships with their families with a set of very challenging recommendations.
Clinks 2017 State of the Sector report reveals the resilience of voluntary organisations working with offenders as well as the increasing financial pressures.
New toolkit for Clinks explores a shared evidence base as a way of measuring desistance with women offenders.