Imprisonment for Public Protection
Last week (17 July 2025), HMPPS published its second annual report on the IPP sentence, covering the 2024/25 financial year. It sets out the action taken “to support those serving the IPP sentence in prison to work towards a safe release, and those in the community towards the termination of their licence” and includes a “refreshed” IPP action plan which HMPPS will enact during the current year.
The report makes lots of bold claims for the progress being made for the 8,711 people who were made subject to this sentence regarded as one of the most unjust punishments ever ordered in this country and which was abolished in December 2012. However, the facts and figures in the report tell a different story and in this blog post I focus on sharing these statistics.
Numbers
The overall population of people serving an IPP sentence in prison has broadly decreased overtime. Figures published in Offender Management Statistics Quarterly show that the total prison population was 5,040 on 30 June 2015 and has since decreased to 2,544 as of 31 March 2025. As of 31 March 2025, there were 1,012 unreleased IPP prisoners and 1,532 recalled IPP prisoners. In other words, more than twelve years after the sentence was abolished, almost three out of ten (29.2%) people remain in prison.
Early terminations
The main positive action that the current Government has taken is to reduce the period that people released from an IPP must service on licence. This had been indefinite but from 1 November 2024:
” A person serving an IPP who was FIRST released five years or more ago AND has been in the community continuously for the last two years will automatically have their licence terminated. If they have not yet had a termination review but were released over three years ago, they will become entitled to a Parole Board review for termination of their licence.”
The report shows that 1,742 people had their licence automatically terminated on 1 November 2024, reducing the number of people serving an IPP in the community from 2,885 to 1,376.
Mental health
There is a host of research evidence on the adverse impact on people’s mental health of being trapped in a sentence with little hope of release despite having, in many case, served more than a decade longer inside than the tariff set by the sentencing judge. On 31 December last year, there remained 233 people serving IPPs who were in secure hospitals. This figure remains almost unchanged from a decade earlier (264 at the end of 2014).
Stuck in prison
Although the changes in the law have gone some way to reduce the burden on people serving an IPP sentence who have been released, they have no impact on the 1,012 on the 12% of people who have been released. In the whole of 2024, just 172 people were released from their IPP sentence for the first time, despite the fact that almost all had served much longer than their tariff.
Recalls remain a huge problem
The number of recalls (figures are for recalls not individuals) has remained almost unmoved since 2018 when there were 637 recalls. In 2024, there were 619. Next year’s figures should show a real fall as there will be a big reduction in the number of people serving their IPP sentence in the community.
Time spent on recall
To my mind one of the most depressing facts in this report is that despite all the talk of progression plans, the average (mean) time spent in prison following recall has broadly increased since 2021. In the last quarter of last year, the average time that people recalled in prison from an IPP sentence as 25 months.
Self-inflicted deaths
The most disturbing chart shows that 90 individuals serving an IPP sentence have tragically taken their own life, more than one in a hundred with that figure bound to rise as several deaths of people on IPP “remain unclassified”.
Conclusion
While the publication of these annual reports is to be welcomed as a way for the Government to be transparent and accountable about the injustices of the IPP sentence. Surely, the priority now should be for the 1,012 people who have never been released to be liberated. There have been a number of constructive suggestions on how to do this, the most recent from an expert working group led by a former Lord Chief Justice published just last month.
Anyone wanting authoritative advice or information on any issue relating to an IPP can be entirely confident in the content on the UNGRIPP website which continues to campaign tirelessly on the issue.
Thanks to Andy Aitchison for kind permission to use the header image in this post. You can see Andy’s work here





One Response
Where to buy weed online in tokyo Telegram @Maddison213