Keep up to date with Drugs & Crime

MoJ reviews restraint techniques on young offenders

MoJ launches review of the use of pain-inducing restraint across all child prisons and escorting procedures after children’s charity threatened legal action.

Share This Post

Share on twitter
Share on facebook
Share on linkedin
Share on email

97 incidents of asphyxiation

Last week (7 June 2018) it came to light that the MoJ is undertaking a 12-month assessment of the use of physical restraint techniques used with young offenders – specifically choke holds which are designed to induce pain and can cause asphyxiation.

I used the phrase “came to light” deliberately as there is no information about the review on the MoJ website. The information in this post comes from a letter from Phillip Lee, the Minister with responsibility for youth justice at the MoJ, to Bob Neill, Chair of the Justice Select Committee (see image of tweet below) and a Guardian article by Eric Allison and Simon Hattenstone.

According to the Guardian, the MoJ was forced into action by a campaign by Article 39, a charity which fights for children’s rights in institutional settings. 

Here’s Article 39’s summary of their work:

In July 2017, Article 39 successfully crowd-funded to legally challenge the use of pain and unjustified restraint during children’s frightening journeys to and from secure children’s homes. Children can be detained in these locked children’s homes from as young as 10 years old.
Escort custody officers employed by GEOAmey are allowed to use force to make children follow orders. Incredible as it sounds, they have been authorised and trained to deliberately inflict pain on children as a form of restraint. This is in striking contrast to the rules that must be followed in secure children’s homes, which restrict when restraint can be used and prohibit the infliction of pain.
Through the enormous generosity of over 150 individuals and several organisations, we raised enough funds to cover our application for a costs capping order and to pay for unavoidable court fees and charges. We wrote to the Ministry of Justice on 1 August 2017, setting out our serious concerns and our intention to seek a judicial review should appropriate action not be taken to safeguard the rights of very vulnerable children.
The Ministry of Justice responded to our concerns in November. Very positively, we were told the government would review the authorisation of pain-inducing restraint during escorting. We submitted evidence in December 2017, and encouraged other experts to contribute too.


The MoJ’s youth justice statistics bulletin published in January this year revealed there had beena 7% decrease in the number of children in custody last year but a 5% increase in the use of force against them by staff.

A third of the approved MMPR methods are pain-inducing. Publicly available copies of the instructor training manual depicting the techniques contain 182 redactions. Article 39 has been engaged in a protracted legal dispute with the MoJ to bring this material into the public domain. 

In a recent parliamentary answer to a question tabled by MP Emma Lewell-Buck, Dr Lee confirmed that the organisations charged with investigating claims of abuse arising from the use of restraint, such as the prisons and probation ombudsman, would not be given access to the MMPR manual.

Lewell-Buck responded:

How on earth can anyone know if the rules have been broken if they don’t know what the rules are? If this abuse was happening in, say, care homes for the elderly, it would be a national scandal. But nobody seems to care about these children.

Article 39’s director, Carolyne Willow, said the review was a welcome development but she feared that many in the prison and security sectors would defend the status quo. She concluded:

Prisons remain the only institutions where the deliberate infliction of pain on children is sanctioned. It will be up to all of us who work with and for children to reassure ministers that institutions can be run safely without the threat or imposition of pain.

Share This Post

Share on twitter
Share on facebook
Share on linkedin
Share on email

Related posts

young offenders playing cards
Inspectors call for reform of YOIs

Chief Prison Inspector Peter Clarke said the negative experiences of children in YOIs underlines the need for their reform.

Solitary confinement of child prisoners

Chief Prison Inspector Peter Clarke calls for an overhaul of the way we “separate” child prisoners in young offender institutions and the ending of solitary confinement.

On Probation
Children leaving custody “set up to fail”

Children and young people released from young offender institutions are getting too little support in the community and are being “set up to fail”, according to a new report by the Prison and Probation inspectorates.

A person being released from Pentonville prison
On Probation
YOIs resettlement work failing

Joint Prison/Probation inspectorate report finds YOIs failing most children and young people on release.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

A bespoke service

We understand that each client has differing needs and concerns. We can assist and discuss with you in advance the likely difficulties and challenges you will face in prison including, Sentence Mitigation Reports, categorisation, disciplinary proceedings, prison transfers, Release on Temporary Licence through to eventual release and living on licence in the community.



Excellence through innovation

With over 20 years’ experience in the criminal justice sector, Unilink is a world leader in probation and community corrections software applications, as well as prisoner self-service, prisoner/case management and prisoner communications. Unilink’s integrated suite of products provide a complete digital solution enabling efficient running of prisons and probation. Underpinned by biometrics it integrates seamlessly to deliver security, efficiency and value – while being proven to help rehabilitate prisoners.

keep informed

One email every day at noon