Keep up-to-date with drugs and crime

The latest research, policy, practice and opinion on our criminal justice and drug & alcohol treatment systems
Search
Education, social care and youth offending
Cross department research present new insights into education and social care background of children who get into trouble.

Patterns of education, social care and youth offending: Executive Summary

A new (14 May 2026)  suite of reports from the Ministry of Justice Data First programme presents new insights into the education and social care background of children and young people in England who have been cautioned or sentenced for any offence, with a focus on knife offences, anti-social behaviour (ASB) and acquisitive offences, and violence against women and girls (VAWG) offences. T

The analysis is descriptive and intended to deepen understanding of the education and social care backgrounds of children and young people who had been cautioned or sentenced for these offences, including their attainment outcomes and characteristics. It also explores sequencing of education and social care factors in relation to a child’s first offence, overlaps across offence groups and patterns of prior offending and reoffending.

Whilst this analysis does not imply there is a causal link between educational outcomes, characteristics and offending, improving the evidence base on these associations is critical to informing early intervention, targeting support effectively, and preventing escalation into more serious and persistent offending.

The research

The analysis draws on administrative MoJ and Department for Education data, linking data on the Police National Computer and the National Pupil Database. It focusses on a cohort of children and young people who finished key stage 2 (KS2) and who were aged 10 at the start of one of the academic years from 2008/09 through to 2013/14.

As a result, the cohort has key stage 4 (KS4) academic years of 2013/14, 2014/15, 2015/16, 2016/17, 2017/18 or 2018/19. The cohort comprises approximately 3.13 million pupils and covers offending between ages 10 to 21 years.

Key findings

  • Offending was rare amongst children and young people, with 5% of pupils in the cohort cautioned or sentenced for any offence. Amongst those, half (51%) had been cautioned or sentenced for an ASB and acquisitive offence, 5% for a VAWG offence and 1.5% for a knife offence.

  • Most first offences occurred between ages 15 and 19, but knife offences tended to occur later, peaking at ages 16–17 and rarely occurring before age 15 (12%, compared with 26–29% for other offences).

  • Indicators of vulnerability were more prevalent, with persistent absence and contact with children’s social care substantially more common across all offence groups than in the overall pupil population, particularly among those cautioned or sentenced for knife offences.

  • Special Educational Needs (SEN) was highly prevalent across all offending groups. Between 72% and 87% had recorded SEN compared with 42% of all pupils.

  • Educational attainment was lower for all offending groups. Knife offences were associated with lower attainment at both KS2 and KS4; ASB and acquisitive offences showed a decline by KS4; and VAWG offences showed lower KS2 attainment but similar outcomes by KS4 to those cautioned or sentenced for any offence.

  • Suspensions were common among offending groups, with 65% of children cautioned or sentenced for any offence having been suspended. This was highest for knife offences (87%) and for ASB and acquisitive offences (73%), compared with 15% of all pupils.

The research also looked into sequencing and found that most education and social care risk factors pre-dated offending among children cautioned or sentenced for an offence.

Patterns of offending

There were some interesting findings here; particularly about knife offences:

  • Most children and young people (94%) who were cautioned or sentenced for an ASB and acquisitive offence did not have a knife or VAWG offence. For VAWG offences, 61% were only cautioned or sentenced for VAWG, with no involvement in the other two offence groups.

  • Prior offending was most common among children and young people cautioned or sentenced to a knife offence, with two-thirds (67%) having a previous offence, compared with 29% for ASB and acquisitive offences and 35% for VAWG offences.

  • Reoffending of any type was common, with the highest rates among those cautioned or convicted for a first knife offence (60%), and lower rates for an initial ASB and acquisitive offence (47%), or first VAWG offence (35%).

  • Reoffending within the same offence category was less common, with 5% of those cautioned or convicted for an initial knife offence committing a subsequent knife offence, compared with 34% for ASB and acquisitive offences and 9% for VAWG offences.

  • Knife offences were preceded by more extensive prior offending, averaging 5.85 offences before a first knife offence, compared with 0.66 for ASB and acquisitive offences and 2.55 for VAWG.

Conclusions

Researchers are at pains to emphasise that all their analysis is descriptive and does not imply causal relationships between education, social care and offending outcomes. Associations do not imply that most children and young people with particular characteristics offend. They also emphasise that although the overall dataset is huge (over 3 million children), the sub-group who commit crime is actually very small and therefore some of the more detailed findings cannot be generalised from.

Despite the focus on knife crimes it is important to remember that this represents a very small number of children.  Just 5% of these 3.1million children had been cautioned or sentenced for any offence – 155,000 children. Of these 155,000 children just 1.5% or 2,325 children had committed a knife offence.

However, it remains the case that the size of the cohorts and the ability to join up datasets from such different areas of government, gives us much more robust data to plan policy than we have ever had before.

 

Thanks to Basit Abdul for kind permission to use the header image in this post which was previously published on Unsplash.

Share This Post

Related posts

On Probation
Desistance work with young people

Alexandra Wigzell and Claire Paterson-Young provide insights into progressive desistance practice in youth justice.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Probation posts sponsored by Unilink

 

Excellence through innovation

Unilink, Europe’s provider of Offender/Probation Management Software

Subscribe

Get every blog post by email for free