Keep up-to-date with drugs and crime

The latest research, policy, practice and opinion on our criminal justice and drug & alcohol treatment systems
Drug recovery wings undermined by poor resettlement support
Evaluation finds some excellent examples of drug recovery wings but the lack of support on release sabotaged the good progress made by many.

Share This Post

Evaluation of drug recovery pilots

A new (4 October 2017) report warns that drug recovery work in prison is largely futile unless suitable accommodation and support are available to prisoners after release.

Research led by the University of York found that many prisoners experienced a ‘cliff edge’, receiving little or no professional support in the weeks preceding or following release, and were housed in inappropriate hostels or funded B&Bs where drugs and prostitution were rife.

The researchers conclude that without adequate support on release, those who have served their time are likely to relapse and reoffend, no matter how good the support received in prison.

The report is based on a substantial evaluation of the Government-funded Drug Recovery Wings (DRWs) pilot in prisons, carried out by researchers from the Centre for Substance Use Research in Glasgow and the Universities of Cambridge and York.

Pilot DRWs were set up in 10 prisons across England and Wales between 2011 and 2012: Brinsford, Brixton, High Down, Holme House, Manchester, Swansea, Chelmsford, Bristol, Styal and New Hall. Their aims included ‘challenging offenders to come off drugs’and delivering abstinence-focused drug recovery services.

The evaluation

The report, Evaluation of the Drug Recovery Wing Pilots, presents the findings from the major evaluation, which was funded by the NIHR Policy Research Programme, and involved 345 interviews and analysis of questionnaire data from over 1,800 prisoners. The four-year study assessed what impact DRWs had on prisoners’ drug or alcohol dependency and their impact on prisoners’ reoffending.

In their report, the researchers conclude that new models of treatment and through-care that link effective approaches in prison with well-resourced, post-release support for prisoners recovering from substance misuse must be made a priority.

Principal Investigator Charlie Lloyd, of the University of York’sDepartment of Social Policy and Social Worksaid: 

It’s important to recognise that some of the pilot DRWs offered promising approaches, involving dedicated staff working with prisoners who wanted to make real changes to their lives. Unfortunately these plans often came to nought on release.

We have to ask ourselves whether any of us could make any radical changes to our lives, if we were forced to live in the type of environments many of our ex-prisoner interviewees had to live in on release. Going forward, there is pressing need to give prisoners with a history of drug dependence a realistic chance of making positive changes to their lives once they have served their time and been released from prison.

Some Drug Recovery Wings, such as at HMP Manchester, offered excellent support. (Credit: Wikimedia Commons/Stemonitis)


The study’s key findings are:

  • There was a fundamental imbalance between the level of the prisoners’ past and present problems, and the input that they received while in prison and most importantly, on release.
  • DRWs were insufficiently resourced in terms of the one-off payment of £30,000 made to each, and insufficiently protected within the prison in terms of accommodation and staffing. A key issue here was the national drop in prison officer numbers over the study period.
  • Comparing the six months prior to incarceration and the six months following release, there was a reduction in self-reported substance use and crime. However, in the absence of a comparison group, this reduction cannot be attributed to the DRWs.
  • Some DRWs offered excellent support, such as Manchester, Swansea and Styal, providing safe therapeutic environments in which prisoners gained motivation and addressed multiple areas of social and personal need, supported by highly motivated and committed staff.
  • However, without continuing help on release from prison, such efforts were often in vain. Many prisoners in this study experienced a ‘cliff edge’ of support, receiving little or no professional support in the weeks preceding or following release. Some of the hostels or funded B&Bs in which they were accommodated were described by interviewees as ‘crackhead hostels’ and ‘absolute madness’.
  • There is a pressing need to identify new, promising approaches that link effective approaches in prison with post-release support for prisoners recovering from substance misuse. 


Blog posts in the drug and alcohol category are kindly sponsored by Breaking Free Group which has developed a powerful and adaptable digital health platform which targets the underlying psychological and lifestyle factors that drive addictive behaviours. Breaking Free has no editorial influence on the contents of this site.

Share This Post

Related posts

Drug Recovery Prisons

Process evaluation of the drug recovery prison at HMP Holme House

2 Responses

  1. Prison drug treatment has not been affected by the Local Authorities draconian and savage cuts to community drug treatment. There must be less available services now for prisons to refer and link up to pre release.

  2. It’s a shame that through the gate has been a dead duck. while offenders are willing to engage in custody. The real work is on release. The new licence has also fail so many people. Speaking to one individual who was homeless before receiving a custodial sentence. Had the impression that he would have a bed on release. A well motivated man with no incentive or help for change. Just reporting.
    One more on thr revoling door.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Probation posts sponsored by Unilink


Excellence through innovation

Unilink, Europe’s provider of Offender/Probation Management Software


Get every blog post by email for free