Significant concerns
Today’s (22 May, 2024) Independent Monitoring Boards National Annual Report for 2024 makes for even more grim reading than we have become accustomed to. As most regular readers will know, Independent Monitoring Boards (IMBs) exist for every prison and immigration removal centre. IMBs are made up of ordinary members of the public who are independent, unpaid and make an average of 3-4 visits to their local institution per month. Their role is to monitor the day-to-day life in their local prison and ensure the proper standards of care indecency are maintained.
Members have unrestricted access to their local prison or immigration detention centre at any time and can talk to any prisoner or detainee they wish to, out of sight and hearing of a members of staff if necessary.
Individual IMBs produce an annual report for each establishment. This national report identifies a range of common issues across the estate and details both new concerns and those repeated from previous years.
Still recovering from the pandemic, the Prison Service faced a new crisis: a rapidly expanding population, with an increase of over 5,200 people during 2023 alone. The consequences of this on the already-diminished provision for effective rehabilitation of those held within these facilities is significant. IMBs highlight the following key concerns in the report, each accompanied by examples of the issue in specific establishments:
High numbers of people at risk of suicide or self-harm in prisons and an increase in disorder and violence in the youth estate.
IMBs had widespread and serious concerns about the safety of those detained, mostly due to prison overcrowding. Improvements were reported as needed to safeguard prisoners at risk of suicide and self-harm.
- At Wetherby YOI, girls self-harmed repeatedly, with staff often resorting to using force in an attempt to keep them safe.
- Dartmoor IMB raised concerns about the quality of ACCT reviews (the process which supports prisoners at risk of self-harm), with care plans lacking detail.
- Weapon carrying was a central concern of YOI IMBs, with children reportedly carrying weapons because they felt unsafe.
Prisoners being shifted around the estate wherever there was room, which often resulted in inappropriate placement.
This affected the stability of prisons, prisoners’ confidence in the system to progress them, and their chances of successfully resettling back into the community.
- Over-18-year-olds were held in young offender institutions (YOIs) to free up adult prison places, which YOI IMBs believe contributed to a lack of stability and risked the safety of younger boys.
- Due to a lack of alternative provision, prisoners with severe mental health needs were often segregated in care and separation units (CSUs). At HMP Buckley Hall, cellular confinement punishments were sometimes suspended due to a lack of space in the CSU, impacting on the prison’s ability to maintain discipline.
- Many Boards highlighted the difficulties prisoners faced accessing progression opportunities, with High Down IMB describing the ‘frustration and hopelessness’ these prisoners felt.
- Prisoners serving imprisonment for public protection sentences (IPPs) faced particularly significant obstacles to progression, with a large proportion of these individuals held in prisons that did not offer the courses they needed for release.
A continued lack of regime and purposeful activity affected both adults and children alike.
Widespread staff shortages contributed to significantly low time out of cell for many prisoners, leaving them bored and directionless. Spending too long with nothing meaningful to do impacted prisoners’ mental health and wellbeing.
- IMBs noted regime cancellations because of staff training, high levels of staff sickness, and officers being redeployed from their core duties.
- Severely restricted regimes were particularly common for vulnerable prisoners and those self-isolating or segregated on wings. Separated boys at Cookham Wood YOI regularly received less than two hours a day out of room.
- The IMB at Doncaster linked the frustration caused by regime cancellations to a heightened risk of self-harm.
- Education provision was insufficient across the YOI estate and children continued to receive fewer hours and less choice than those in the community.
A physical state of disrepair across the prison estate and some YOIs.
Some prisoners were kept in conditions described as inhumane, sometimes without access to basic sanitation.
While the physical state of Victorian buildings was particularly dire, these issues were also seen in more modern prisons. The IMB at HMP Five Wells, built in 2022, reported significant design faults with the prison leading to poor airflow, uncomfortably hot temperatures and unusable low mobility cells.
- At HMP Winchester, prisoners were able to dig through internal cell walls using plastic cutlery.
- An absence of in-cell sanitation, with serious consequences for hygiene and dignity, was reported by IMBs at HMPs Coldingley, Isle of Wight, Grendon, Long Lartin and Bristol.
- The physical environment was especially unfit for elderly or disabled prisoners. IMBs at HMP Lancaster Farms and HMP Dartmoor reported instances of prisoners who were not physically able to climb onto the top bunk sleeping on the floor.
Thanks to Andy Aitchison for kind permission to use the images in this post. You can see Andy’s work here