Keep up-to-date with drugs and crime

The latest research, policy, practice and opinion on our criminal justice and drug & alcohol treatment systems
If Rob Allen were Justice Secretary…
The Coalition’s policy of making prison “not smaller but cheaper” has left the system in a parlous state, endangering prisoners, staff and the wider public. An urgent rebalancing of penal policy is required to create an affordable and effective approach to people in conflict with the law.

Share This Post

Rob Allen is a vastly experienced researcher and consultant on criminal justice issues and is the fifth contributor in the current series setting out the top three priorities for the new Justice Secretary. You can read Rob’s blog here and follow @robroballen on Twitter.

Curbing the prison population

If I were Justice Secretary, my main priority would be to curb the growing prison population so that those who do genuinely need to be locked up can be held safely and in ways which equip them to desist from crime. The Coalition’s policy of making prison “not smaller but cheaper” has left the system in a parlous state, endangering prisoners, staff and the wider public. An urgent rebalancing of penal policy is required to create an affordable and effective approach to people in conflict with the law.


Sentencing Council

By May 2016, I would have taken action on three main fronts to achieve this.  First I would have instructed the Sentencing Council to revise guidelines in such a way that sentence lengths are reduced by a quarter and to produce specific guidelines for women which create a much stronger presumption against the use of prison.

Despite the debate about the appropriateness of short term sentences, it is an increase in the length of jail terms which has driven growth in prison numbers, (prompting the need for the Wrexham Super Prison which I’d axe on day one).  I’d actually want more short prison sentences – but instead of long ones. Reducing sentence lengths might be a tough call politically but opposition is likely to be short-lived. Over time, it would enable resources to be used to strengthen community based responses to offending which produce much greater public benefit.


Justice Reinvestment

Second I would have fundamentally altered the ways such resources are allocated by progressively introducing justice reinvestment measures.  The costs of prison would be devolved to local agencies in order to incentivise investment in prevention, alternatives to prison and resettlement activities.

If Greater Manchester can be given control of its £6 billion health budget, there is no reason not to move responsibility for criminal justice costs out of Whitehall along the lines proposed here . Local authorities would assume all of the costs of custodial placements for under 18’s from April 2016- costs which would not include the proposed Secure College which would be scrapped on day two.


The Youth Justice Board

Third, additionally on young people, I would have expanded the remit of the YJB to cover young adult offenders and legislate to give police, prosecutors and courts the flexibility to treat 18-20 year olds in the same way as under 18’s in appropriate cases.

This is an age group which is highly malleable to change but has been neglected by successive governments. Stronger multi agency teams to supervise and support young adults the community together with better staffed and equipped custodial establishments could start to bring down their high rates of re-offending and the financial and social costs which they entail. Areas could be invited to bid to run pilot “Young Adult Offending Teams” from day three, with a view to mainstreaming the approach during the government’s second year.
The purpose of this blog series is to stimulate a debate about where our criminal justice system should be heading. I’d love to hear your thoughts on what the justice priorities should be.

Please use the comments section below or follow the conversation on Twitter, using the hashtag #nextGrayling

Share This Post

Related posts

On Probation
Young adults and parole

Rob Allen and Laura Janes on their new report on young adults and parole.

On Probation
The Probation Institute’s Justice priorities

Splitting up responsibility for offender management has created a divide between a small national probation service and the 21 CRCs leading a huge increase in bureaucracy and growing professional tensions. The probation profession is potentially being undermined as there is no longer a requirement for CRCs to use staff with recognised probation qualifications. They no longer have to employ qualified probation officers to manage complex cases.

The Prison Governors’ Association justice priorities

We cannot go on thinking we can imprison our way to a safer society, not only is it poor value for money for the taxpayer, it also fails to recognise the evidence already available that there are better and more cost effective ways to protect the public and reduce reoffending.

On Probation
Justice should embrace the treasury

It is this relentless focus on ensuring that everything we do actually achieves our aims that is desperately needed in crime and justice policy. To do something radical such as cutting prison numbers, a new Justice Secretary will need allies and I think the best bet is the Treasury.

On Probation
If NoOffence! were Justice Secretary

The design of the CJS is not evidence-led, despite some attempts to reference evidence when it fits the prevailing ‘politics’. The prevailing ‘politics’ and public attitude is one of punishment first and foremost . Any discussion is predominantly an emotional response to the harm done by those who commit crimes, bounded by vested interests and political dogma.

On Probation
If Mike Maiden was Justice Secretary…

I want a public sector provider that sits at the heart of the process. I can’t turn the clock back but I can make sure that one part of the system takes overall responsibility. It’s got to be the public sector because I can’t see that justice and transparency are served by any other sector playing the role.

2 Responses

  1. Rob, you have hit on subjects that matter – you have got me thinking! Thank you! 3 quick questions:
    1. Instead of Secure College’s what would you have?
    2. Shorter Sentences is an issue as rehabilitation is a process, not an event. How would you ensure through the gate processes?
    3. Young Adult Offending Teams 18 – 20 years old reduces continuity and increases handovers and opportunity for resistance to change? Should the age not be in line with Education up to 25 years old (and keeping the Young Adult within the YOT) – this would reduce handovers and work with the Young Person until full cognitive maturity (Males).

    Thank you though, again you have got me thinking!

    1. Justin

      Instead of secure colleges i’d go for smaller local units -more costly up front but numbers would be reduced by reforms to DTO’s proposed here

      Replacing long sentences with shorter ones shouldnt prove an obstacle to rehabilitation. There may be some very short sentences where its hard to make a relationship and encourage desistance but this is better done in the community. We need to move the centre of gravity of the rehab process outside prison.

      Id be happy to see a transitional category up to 25 in appropriate cases.



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Probation posts sponsored by Unilink


Excellence through innovation

Unilink, Europe’s provider of Offender/Probation Management Software


Get every blog post by email for free