Keep up-to-date with drugs and crime

The latest research, policy, practice and opinion on our criminal justice and drug & alcohol treatment systems
IPPs, recalls and the future of parole
Martin Jones, Chief Exec of the Parole Board, reflects on the huge rise in the number of prisoners recalled and looks to the future of parole.

Share This Post


I have worked in criminal justice for nearly 25 years; so am very aware that in the 1990s the prison population grew fast. The population increased by over 20,000 in around 5 years from 1993-1998.  That significant rise was largely the result of longer sentences and an increased use of custody. It is notable that despite those huge increases, in the late 1990s, there were just 150 recalled prisoners. In June 2017 there were 6,390.

The changes in the recall population were driven primarily by legislative change, although Serious Further Offences (particularly the Sonnex case) have also had an impact.

As CEO of the Parole Board I know that recall is an important tool in preventing further serious offences, and further victims. There are sometimes situations where recall may be absolutely essential to protect the public from serious harm. However, I am also clear that the sheer number of  recalls, 21,721 over the last twelve months, makes this an area worthy of focus.

The Parole Board now considers thousands of recall cases each year. Last year we held over 2,000 oral hearings in recall cases; over double the number held 5 years ago. What do we learn from those figures?

IPPs are the fastest growing area of recalls

As previously noted the Parole Board is now releasing significantly more IPPs than it did 10 years ago. Because there are more IPPs being managed in the community it is inevitable that more are at risk of recall. However the trend line is a cause for concern. In June 2017 there were 760 IPPs who were back in prison following recall; up tenfold over the last five years. Last year the Parole Board ordered the release of 905 IPPs (including the re-release of 249 recalled IPPs).  In the same period 481 IPPs were recalled. So more than 50% of the number released were recalled (prisoners can of course be recalled after a few days – or some years after release).

I believe there is a strong case for looking again at the current lifelong licence – to ensure that IPPs who are judged safe to release have a greater chance of moving on with their lives.

Around 60% of those reviewed by the Board at oral hearing were rereleased

I think this demonstrates that by the time a case gets to a hearing most recalled prisoners are not assessed as representing a significant risk to the public. I do not think this necessarily means that the initial recall decision was wrong; but it does demonstrate that things may not always be as they first appear.

We know that many people leaving prison lead chaotic lives.  Many struggle to cope when they leave prison; and we need to be careful that their struggles to cope are not misinterpreted.

I do think that all efforts should be made to prevent unnecessary recalls. I therefore strongly endorse the efforts being made within HMPPS to reduce recalls; through looking at guidance and training. That work is already starting to bear fruit and the recall population is actually starting to fall (down by 3%) according to the most recent statistics.

Speaking to probation staff, I understand that one of the biggest problems they face is uncertainty. Is a breach of a licence condition a worrying sign of increased risk? Or are there good explanations/mitigation? A recall decision is ultimately a judgement call.

Often things will only be clear after the prisoner is recalled. The Scottish Parole Board makes the final decision on licence recall and, whilst we need to think carefully about workload, I do wonder if a similar early review would work in our jurisdiction.

I also wonder if the system should adopt a tougher approach where somebody is charged with further offences. The criminal courts are well placed to bail or remand those charged with criminal offences; we should be careful that those on licence are not subject to disproportionate punishment through recall, unless there is clear evidence of significant risk.

What next for the Parole Board?

Since joining the Parole Board my main priority has been to bring the backlog down to pre Osborn levels. My favourite chart (below) shows we are nearly there.

Whilst I am extremely pleased at the progress made; I can see further challenges on the horizon.

As highlighted at the Justice Select Committee, we still need to do much more to reduce our deferral rate. Too often all of the parties get to the hearing and the hearing does not complete. Unnecessary delays lead to increased uncertainty for victims, prisoners, and their families.  The Board has set up a new project to look at how we achieve better results.  I want us to work with prisons, probation and legal representatives to improve the effectiveness of our system.

We also need to tackle diversity in the Parole Board itself. Whilst the Parole Board has an excellent gender balance; I am really keen to improve the number of black, Asian and other minority ethnic groups on the board. I am absolutely certain that greater diversity in our membership would increase confidence in the parole system and help us make even better decisions. Over the next 4-6 months I am looking to talk to as many people as I can in order that we have a significant increase in applications when we next recruit.

Share This Post

Related posts

The Voices of IPPs

User Voice interviewed 111 people subject to the IPP sentence.

Prison van bringing prisoners from court
On Probation
IPP recalls mostly in line with policy

HMI Probation finds IPP recalls mostly in line with policy but deplores lack of support and continuity of supervising officers.

4 responses

  1. The figures are frightening, the tragedy of so many broken lives including those of families who’s loved one’s have given up.
    We should not be persecuting people and there is no other word suitable to describe the treatment we are forcing those on the IPP sentence to go through.
    If the parole board release them their nightmare doesn’t end. One slip up and their back inside again, potentially indefinitely how can anyone cope with that.
    Inexcusable Persistent Persecution , the true meaning of IPP

  2. I could not agree with you more Jez, that it is what it is, persecution.
    Justification for this, ‘Public Protection’, is recall really the answer to Public Protection? Far more needs to be done, there are no effective support systems to support those who have been damaged by many years in incarceration, way beyond their punishment term, shameful.
    And what about those broken lives.
    Trying to pick up the shattered pieces, in my son’s case , on three occasions now, and for those families, who are really the ones left to pick up the pieces and support their loved ones to try and cope outside the toxic institutions we call prisons.

  3. The level of Ipp recalls is sickening as many are recalled over going to appointment late or coming back to hostel late by like 10mins like how many are going to move onwards in theirs lives if they get recalled over silliness like that… Injustice this prison system also the affect it has on the prisoners and their loved ones also the poor children that missing out on their mother and father it affective us all this has made me so unwell and my partner is a recall for the last 4 years I just want him home where he belongs now it hurts it’s like grieving for Someone that’s still alive… But hey the parole board or probation or prison don’t seen to even care about the heartace we have to go thought for years cos of this ipp messed up the government put into place but removed it but we are still suffering why tell me this the years we have lost and pain and tears that we have had over this sentence.

  4. I am a ipp prisoner who has been recalled on 4 occasions for no offence i thought the sentence was bad after serving 10 years and another 2 and a half in recalls. I was employed with a job doing well and then recalled for being late silly then you have to contend with a violent prison system that normal prisoners just loose canteen for punishment if we get involved or found to be involved in violence we loose years. Not fair in prison or out the torment this causes is well torture in the first degree and we are still inflicting this on human beings when every one in power knows its wrong why cant a government stand up and take a stand on whats wrong. Worried on how they release and if they say they were wrong this opens the gates for compensation so would rather watch people die and rot in a system not fit for purpose in any way. The powers that be should rot for this vile mess.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Probation posts sponsored by Unilink


Excellence through innovation

Unilink, Europe’s provider of Offender/Probation Management Software


Get every blog post by email for free