A practical framework for payment by results
A new seven stage framework for target achievement in payment by results from Dr Laura Johnstone.
6th June 2017
Menu
Here you can find over 150 posts tracking every major development in payment by results since 2011. You can see where PbR has succeeded and, more frequently, where it has failed across a wide range of sectors: offending, welfare, employment, substance misuse… If you’re looking for something in particular, try the search box below.
A new seven stage framework for target achievement in payment by results from Dr Laura Johnstone.
DWP announces that worklessness is key issue which affects children and sets out bold plan to tackle it in next phase of Troubled Families Programme.
New report from Lloyds Bank Foundation finds that poor commissioning practices threaten the survival of small charities.
Last in a series of infographics which demystify the jargon and technical terms associated with the payment by results commissioning model.
Third in a series of infographics which demystify the jargon and technical terms associated with the payment by results commissioning model.
Second in a series of infographics which demystify the jargon and technical terms associated with the payment by results commissioning model.
An updated set of principles for commissioning by payment by results based on a substantial review of the most recent research.
First in a series of infographics which demystify the jargon and technical terms associated with the payment by results commissioning model.
Emerging findings from the use of Payment by Results in international development show clear benefits alongside a number of concerns.
Reform report says new Work and Health Programme should level the playing field for possible providers but still recommends heavy PbR approach.
New report from Social Finance looks at the spread of social impact bonds across the globe and expects their development to become less complex.
The purpose of the new interactive tool is to help commissioners, investors and providers consider whether it might be appropriate to use PbR for a particular service. The tool asks key questions on both the rationale for using PbR and key elements of the contract such as defining and validating outcomes and guarding against common PbR problems such as “creaming and parking” and unintended consequences.
