The voice of probation - the Probation Institute enters the debate on prison reform arguing for a reinvestment in community sanctions.

Share This Post

Share on twitter
Share on facebook
Share on linkedin
Share on email

The Probation Institute comes to the party

One thing that has been missing from the recent discussions of penal reform has been the voice of probation.

Not only has the Justice Secretary Michael Gove rarely mentioned the probation service, but it has been hard for the probation service itself to get its views heard in the media.

Of course, the modern probation service is a new animal, split into the statutory National Probation Service which services the courts and deals with high risk offenders and the 21 new (almost all) private Community Rehabilitation Companies who manage low and medium risk offenders.

This divided nature makes it even harder for the probation voice to be heard.

So, I was very heartened to see the Probation Institute contribute to the debate via a new (4March 2016) position paper on Penal Reform.

Prison reforms not deep enough to be effective

The Probation Institute welcomes the government’s commitment to penal reform but questions whether the rather limited concrete changes announced so far will have any real impact.

The PI paper highlights the following three key issues:

1: The Prison population is unsustainably high

The PI argues that with crime having fallen so much over the last two decades, the prison population should not be anywhere near as high as it is.

It highlights the number of non-violent offenders and those with addiction and mental health issues as prisoners who do not need to be in prison and states that overcrowding is also making a proper rehabilitative focus in prisons increasingly difficult.

2: Governor autonomy on its own is not enough to reduce reoffending rates

The PI agrees that governor autonomy is a good thing but says that this flexibility is unlikely to make much difference because:

  • Population management of an overcrowded system cannot be done at an individual prison level.
  • Resettlement services need to be informed by detailed knowledge of the local community into which their inmates will be released, which, the PI contends, is difficult for governors and their staff to acquire.
  • The PbR pilots at Doncaster and Peterborough Prisons show that tying performance on re-offending to prison-based services is problematic, to say the least.
  • It does not help address the key failing of poor co-ordination of services between prison and the community.

3: Justice Reinvestment is required to achieve reductions in re-offending

The PI argues that only by cutting reoffending and the numbers of people in prison can resources be released to:

  • Allow governors to run proper regimes which support a resettlement approach and
  • Facilitate a reinvestment in community sanctions which are more likely to “bring re-offending rates down further, faster and more cost-effectively.”

probation institute 2016

Conclusion

The Probation Institute concludes its paper by reasserting the value of probation and an evidence-based approach to tackling reoffending:

The justice community has known for at least 20 years what the evidence says about what needs to be done. And yet policy that is in line with the evidence on reducing reoffending seems very difficult to implement. We would urge government to pay heed to the evidence and act accordingly.

 

Please note, the image at the top of this post is taken from the Probation Institute report and is the copyright of Mark Harvey (www.socialissuesphotography.co.uk)

Share This Post

Share on twitter
Share on facebook
Share on linkedin
Share on email

Related posts

On Probation
Patchy provision for veterans on probation

Centre for Crime and Justice finds lack of an evidence base and very patchy provision for veterans on probation in new report for the Probation Institute.

Prison
Prison staff the key to penal reform

RSA Future Prison report due out at end of October expected to argue that empowering front line prison staff is key to developing a more rehabilitative system.

Prison
Is prison reform stalled?

In her 1st appearance before the Select Committee, new Justice Secretary Liz Truss refused to confirm or deny the imminence of a prison reform bill.

Prison
How can we make our prisons safer?

The Justice Committee finds that overall levels of safety in prisons are continuing to deteriorate and demands a MoJ/NOMS action plan with quarterly updates

Prison
What does a good prison look like?

Excellent new discussion paper from Clinks looks to develop a constructive dialogue about how our soon-to-be-reformed prison system should look.

Prison
Damning Wormwood Scrubs inspection report

Most prisoners still had less than two hours a day out of their cells and we found more than half the population locked behind their doors during the working day.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

A bespoke service

We understand that each client has differing needs and concerns. We can assist and discuss with you in advance the likely difficulties and challenges you will face in prison including, Sentence Mitigation Reports, categorisation, disciplinary proceedings, prison transfers, Release on Temporary Licence through to eventual release and living on licence in the community.

Unilink

 

Excellence through innovation

With over 20 years’ experience in the criminal justice sector, Unilink is a world leader in probation and community corrections software applications, as well as prisoner self-service, prisoner/case management and prisoner communications. Unilink’s integrated suite of products provide a complete digital solution enabling efficient running of prisons and probation. Underpinned by biometrics it integrates seamlessly to deliver security, efficiency and value – while being proven to help rehabilitate prisoners.

keep informed

One email every day at noon