Although I’m not an instinctive supporter of league tables for public services, I think there is real value in comparing the performance of probation services, given the scrutiny following the implementation of the new public/private system known as Transforming Rehabilitation.
The (totally unofficial) league table I’ve constructed below enables three types of comparisons:
- How National Probation Service divisions and Community Rehabilitation Companies compare with their peers.
- How NPS divisions are performing compared with the CRCs in their area.
- How probation organisations compare in different areas of performance: leadership, case assessment, court reports, unpaid work etc.
The league table benefits from the robust new scoring methodology adopted by Her Majesty’s Inspection of Probation earlier this year. The new system involves inspecting a single organisation (either a CRC or an NPS division) and giving that organisation one of four overall ratings: outstanding; good; requires improvement or poor.
Inspectors give individual ratings for ten different domains set out in detail in the infographic below but covering three main headings:
- Organisational delivery
- Case supervision
- NPS/CRC specific work
As you can see from the league table below, most, but not all NPS divisions are out-performing CRCs by a substantial margin.
Perusing the table does throw up some interesting features; for instance all but three probation providers (NPS and CRCs) are rated good or better for leadership. On the other hand, every CRC was rated poor or inadequate in they key tasks of implementing and delivering supervision and for reviewing cases.
Given that CRC’s successors, to be known as “Innovative Partners”, will be delivering Unpaid Work (and accredited programmes) via 12 regional contracts, you can also cast your eye down column 4.1 to see how well CRCs are doing the job at the moment.
The table will be updated following the publication of every inspection report.