How well is your probation service performing?

Probation league table - updated 16 April 2020

Share This Post

Share on twitter
Share on facebook
Share on linkedin
Share on email

At the completion of the first round of inspections under HMI Probation’s new banding system in September 2019, the Midlands Division of the National Probation Service were top of the table.

Rather soberingly in the first round of inspections, just one CRC was rated “good”, one “inadequate” and the other nineteen areas as “requiring improvement”. On the NPS front, five areas were rated as “good” and “two as requiring improvement”.
The new season kicked off on 21 January 2020 with the publication of an inspection report into the performance of Thames Valley CRC. Hearteningly, the CRC has improved performance markedly and shot up the table as a result. Two of the six CRC inspection reports published since have also seen organisations been upgraded from an overall assessment of “requires improvement” to “good”.
Although I’m not an instinctive supporter of league tables for public services, I think there is real value in comparing the performance of probation services, given the scrutiny following the implementation of the new public/private system known as Transforming Rehabilitation.

The (totally unofficial) league table I’ve constructed below enables three types of comparisons:
  1. How National Probation Service divisions and Community Rehabilitation Companies compare with their peers.
  2. How NPS divisions are performing compared with the CRCs in their area.
  3. How probation organisations compare in different areas of performance: leadership, case assessment, court reports, unpaid work etc.

The league table benefits from the robust new scoring methodology adopted by Her Majesty’s Inspection of Probation which involves inspecting a single organisation (either a CRC or an NPS division) and giving that organisation one of four overall ratings: outstanding; good; requires improvement or poor.

Inspectors give individual ratings for ten different domains set out in detail in the infographic below but covering three main headings:

  1. Organisational delivery
  2. Case supervision
  3. NPS/CRC specific work

As you can see from the league table below, most, but not all NPS divisions are out-performing CRCs by a substantial margin.

Given that CRC’s successors, to be known as “Probation Delivery Partners”, will be delivering Unpaid Work (and accredited programmes) via 12 regional contracts, you can also cast your eye down column 4.1 to see how well CRCs are doing the job at the moment.

The league table is constantly updated with the publication of new inspection reports.

Share This Post

Share on twitter
Share on facebook
Share on linkedin
Share on email

Related posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

All Probation Posts are sponsored by Unilink

With over 20 years’ experience in the criminal justice sector, Unilink is a world leader in probation and community corrections software applications, as well as prisoner self-service, prisoner/case management and prisoner communications. Unilink’s integrated suite of products provide a complete digital solution enabling efficient running of prisons and probation. Underpinned by biometrics it integrates seamlessly to deliver security, efficiency and value – while being proven to help rehabilitate prisoners.

keep informed

One email every day at noon