Is Reform think tank really doing it justice?

Should PCCs rule the world?

I posted earlier this week about whether Police and Crime Commissioners are a good idea.

I came to the conclusion that there were plenty of arguments for and against but that there is an emerging consensus that we really won’t know until they take office on this November 19th.

However, the Reform think tank, is so confident that PCCs will be a success that it published a new report last week – Doing it Justice – in which they advocate that PCCs should be in control not only of local police and criminal justice agencies but the fire and rescue and ambulance services too.

The report argues that PCCs should take responsibility for commissioning the services currently delivered by probation trusts and for the direct commissioning of the prison places required by a local area.

Who are Reform?

Although Reform emphasise their political independence and the fact that they are a charity, it seems fair to say that they have close associations with the Conservative Party – they were founded by a Conservative MP and their current director, Andrew Haldenby, worked in the Conservative Research Department and is a regular contributor to the popular Conservative Home blog.

It’s quite common for Reform to advance views in keeping with the latest thinking among Conservative-minded politicians and thinkers.

Since the Conservatives are obviously in Government at the moment, this makes the report an even more interesting read.

The argument

The central argument of the report is that increased co-operation across criminal justice and emergency services is the key to improving what is generally agreed to be an under-co-ordinated system, and vital at a time of substantial cuts in public expenditure.

The report identifies 28 national and local initiatives which demonstrate the effectiveness of integrated working.

Many of these are well-known and generally agreed to be successful, albeit with some exceptions.

The results of Project Daedalus (designed to cut re-offending rates of young offenders at Feltham) have been widely disputed.

And the payment by results pilot at HMP Doncaster is in its very early days with no published results.

The report also rather jumbles up examples of very different initiatives on the basis that they all involve some form of integration/co-ordination.

The sharing of back-office resources between Essex and Kent police forces is, to my mind, rather different from the Red Hook Community Justice Center in Brooklyn which is a real and long-standing example of a local justice system which engages local communities.

 

 

But Police and Crime Commissioners?

The report goes into considerable detail to argue its case – it’s a really useful compendium of information about changes in workforce numbers in different criminal justice agencies, the boundaries of different police forces, probation trusts etc. and much more.

It’s hard to argue against the principles of better co-ordination and integration and the report is honest enough to acknowledge that multi-agency partnership work has been the focus of reforms by governments of all colours (Blue, Red & Blue/Yellow) for the last 25 years.

What I do find strange is the argument that the untested office of Police and Crime Commissioner should be the way to drive forwards massive integration.

Wouldn’t PCCs suddenly need their own new super-department to drive through change and supervise co-ordination?
Wouldn’t this just be a new layer of bureaucracy to add to the many others that flourish in the criminal justice sytem?
Wouldn’t changes be susceptible to immediate reverse every four years when a new PCC ¬†from a different political party is elected?

 

I’d be very interested in the views of readers.

You can download the report for free and follow Reform on Twitter @reformthinktank

 

 

One Response

  1. Steve Batchelder (@stevebatchelder) 26th October 2012

Leave a Reply

Select Language
Andrew Brown July 16
Interesting drug and alcohol facts July 2016
The extra mile road sign
The practicalities of desistance and recovery
two-wine-celebration-glasse
Drinking patterns in 2016
facebook cannabis
Do digital interventions for cannabis problems work?
EM FI
Latest research on electronic monitoring
gavel court room
Early guilty pleas may force up prison population
reflections
Refreshing your perspective with peer research
women who kill dv
What happens to women who kill their abusers?
RW MoJ
Who are the new team at the Moj?
Liz Truss
Introducing new Justice Secretary Liz Truss
SUI RDA FI
Service user involvement with offenders
panel
Referral orders not achieving their potential
HOme Affairs prostitution
Should we decriminalise sex work?
paper clips
Myth: Only radical reforms can reduce crime
crime headlines
Why do we always think crime is rising?
3d rendering the empty room with open window
Time for a sensible debate on crime?
RW MoJ
Who are the new team at the Moj?
RDA prisoner involvement FI
How to do prisoner involvement properly
prison hospital
Health and well-being in future prisons
Liz Truss
Introducing new Justice Secretary Liz Truss
Payment by Results
sumo
Can the new Work Programme succeed?
SIBS SF FI
Social Impact Bonds: The early years
2
Making sense of payment by results
Finally Friday Social Media Innovation Why I Tweet
facebook cannabis
Do digital interventions for cannabis problems work?
AG FI
The law and social media
Unlock Youtube
Unlocking offenders’ doors to employment
MoJ women in cj stats FI
Women and the Criminal Justice System
AG FI
The law and social media
Wooden gallows rope and noose in St Augustine Florida
Global executions at a 25 year high
Balaclava girl
Crime accounts for 1.5% of world GDP

Keep up to date on drugs, crime & PbR

Every new post straight to your inbox