The purpose of this blog series is to stimulate a debate about where our criminal justice system should be heading. I'd love to hear your thoughts on what the justice priorities should be.

Share This Post

Share on twitter
Share on facebook
Share on linkedin
Share on email

Three justice priorities

As regular readers know only too well, the last five years have seen some of the biggest changes in our Justice system, in particular since Chris Grayling took over the role of Justice Secretary in September 2012. These include:

  • The privatisation of the probation service via Transforming Rehabilitation,
  • Numerous changes removing “privileges from prisoners” to make prison a more punitive experience
  • The decision to build the Welsh “Titan” super prison in Wrexham
  • The Secure College initiative for young offenders
  • The large scale cuts and changes to the Legal Aid system

At the time of writing, it’s far from clear who will win the election on 7 May nor what direction they will take the criminal justice system.

For the first time in recent years, it seems as if the political parties may have different policies in the criminal justice arena. But what should the priorities be for the next Justice Secretary? (I should point out that the next Justice Secretary might be Mr Grayling again, but I’m guessing that if the Conservatives win, he may still move on.)


If I were Justice Secretary…

So, I thought the timing was right to invite a range of key criminal justice agencies and commentators to write a brief blog post setting out their top three priorities for the new Justice Secretary to be achieved in his/her first year in office.

polling station


I’ve set out to get views from as many points of view as possible – think tanks, campaign groups, user organisations, providers, unions etc. The Prison Reform Trust,   Rob Allen, Jim Brown, NAPO, Paul Senior and the Revolving Doors Agency are among those who have signed up.

Contributors were given carte blanche with the sole ground rule being a strict 500 word limit to make it easy for everyone reading on phones and tablets.

The series will kick off next week with the views of Andrew Neilson (@neilsonandrew) of the Howard League for Penal Reform and will run through the election campaign with one or two contributions per week.

The purpose of this blog series is to stimulate a debate about where our criminal justice system should be heading. I’d love to hear your thoughts on what the justice priorities should be.

Please use the comments section below or follow the conversation on Twitter, using the hashtag #nextGrayling

Share This Post

Share on twitter
Share on facebook
Share on linkedin
Share on email

Related posts

On Probation
The Probation Institute’s Justice priorities

Splitting up responsibility for offender management has created a divide between a small national probation service and the 21 CRCs leading a huge increase in bureaucracy and growing professional tensions. The probation profession is potentially being undermined as there is no longer a requirement for CRCs to use staff with recognised probation qualifications. They no longer have to employ qualified probation officers to manage complex cases.

The Prison Governors’ Association justice priorities

We cannot go on thinking we can imprison our way to a safer society, not only is it poor value for money for the taxpayer, it also fails to recognise the evidence already available that there are better and more cost effective ways to protect the public and reduce reoffending.

On Probation
Justice should embrace the treasury

It is this relentless focus on ensuring that everything we do actually achieves our aims that is desperately needed in crime and justice policy. To do something radical such as cutting prison numbers, a new Justice Secretary will need allies and I think the best bet is the Treasury.

On Probation
If NoOffence! were Justice Secretary

The design of the CJS is not evidence-led, despite some attempts to reference evidence when it fits the prevailing ‘politics’. The prevailing ‘politics’ and public attitude is one of punishment first and foremost . Any discussion is predominantly an emotional response to the harm done by those who commit crimes, bounded by vested interests and political dogma.

One Response

  1. If i was justice secretary, i would say i was deeply sorry for the damage and hurt i caused and leave the role of justice secretary to some one more competent.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

All Probation Posts are sponsored by Unilink

With over 20 years’ experience in the criminal justice sector, Unilink is a world leader in probation and community corrections software applications, as well as prisoner self-service, prisoner/case management and prisoner communications. Unilink’s integrated suite of products provide a complete digital solution enabling efficient running of prisons and probation. Underpinned by biometrics it integrates seamlessly to deliver security, efficiency and value – while being proven to help rehabilitate prisoners.

keep informed

One email every day at noon