Menu
budget cut
Russell Webster

Russell Webster

Criminal Justice & substance misuse expert and author of this blog.

How did criminal justice change in the coalition years?

Share on twitter
Share on facebook
Share on linkedin
Share on print
Share on email

The UK Justice Policy Review

The Centre for Crime and Justice Studies has been publishing the UK Justice Policy Review for the last four years, in its own words, it provides a:

[alert-announce]”concise, critical analysis of emerging policy developments brings this together with robust data about criminal justice for a particular year.”[/alert-announce]

Earlier this year (23 March 2015) the CCJS also produced an one off overview: The Coalition Years: Criminal Justice in the United Kingdom 2010 to 2015.

The report is written by  Richard Garside (well worth a follow on Twitter: @richardjgarside ) and Matt Ford and is supported by the Hadley Trust.

As we wait to see what sort of Justice Secretary Michael Gove will be (we already have a good idea of Theresa May’s style as Home Secretary), I thought it might be interesting to remind ourselves of the range and scale of changes in criminal justice under the last government.

[divider]

Different approaches within the UK

The report starts by highlighting how the different political approaches within England & Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland led to different approaches to criminal justice, albeit the dominant factor throughout the UK was the austerity agenda.

“Developing markets in the operation and delivery of criminal justice services was central to policy in England and Wales. In Scotland the state, rather than the market, took precedence. Activities in Northern Ireland were guided by an ambition to build an inclusive society free from sectarian strife.”

The marketisation of criminal justice in England and Wales proceeded at pace, via a number of different central and local commissioning models including:

  • Price-competitive tendering for criminal legal aid – with the ambition of reducing costs and consolidating the market of providers.
  • The privatisation of two thirds of the probation service.
  • The introduction of payment by results into the private probation contracts with the purpose of focusing new providers on reducing reoffending rates both for those serving community sentences and those released from custody.
  • The creation of Police and Crime Commissioners responsible for the co-ordination of and budgets for local criminal justice services, as well as the procurement of a range of police- and crime-related services, including services for victims.

There was also considerable political interest in privatising more prisons. However, the performance of private prisons was much criticised and no new prisons were transferred from the public sector.

Perhaps the biggest change in Scotland was the amalgamation of the eight regional police forces into one Police Scotland. Speculation continues to grow that England will follow suit, and it seems very likely that there will at least be several mergers between police forces in England at some point in the current parliament.

[divider]

Austerity

Across the United Kingdom, spending on the public order and safety categorycoalition years cover – which largely comprises criminal justice – grew by 17 per cent in the four years to 2010. In the four years to 2014 it fell by 12 per cent. The cuts were greatest in England and Wales, where the United Kingdom government had direct political control over criminal justice. In Scotland, where the United Kingdom government’s control was the most qualified, the cuts were the slightest. In England and Wales, Home Office and Ministry of Justice budgets fell by 19 per cent and 29 per cent respectively between 2010 and 2015

The CCJS reports that the Institute for Fiscal Studies estimates that both the Home Office and MoJ could face even larger cuts in real terms between now and 2020.

[divider]

Politics

A theme shared by many of the 18 criminal justice agencies and commentators  who participated in a guest blog series I ran over the election campaign to canvass views on criminal justice priorities for the new parliament was that criminal justice policy needed to be based more on the evidence base than political ideology.

Regrettably, the CCJS review of the coalition years found that the process of criminal justice reform is rarely based on evidence but remains, at heart, a political project.

 

 

Share on twitter
Share on facebook
Share on linkedin
Share on print
Share on email

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Measuring social impact

Our cutting-edge approach to measurement and evaluation is underpinned by robust methods, rigorous analyses, and cost-effective data collection.

Proving Social Impact

Get the Data provides Social Impact Analytics to enable organisations to demonstrate their impact on society.

Select Language

Keep up-to-date on drugs and crime

You will get one email with a new article every day.